Re: Dropping angle-bracket syntax for animation

• From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 20:01:48 -0700
• To: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>
• Cc: public-fx@w3.org
• Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDFfSSSSn-hnn_QxWCBh1_Y+-MWdgNXTAiYRVz4xe4bhQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com> wrote:
> Again, as I mentioned in my previous post, I think we can mandate CSS
> support in a way that doesn't raise the barrier to entry too high by
> providing an angle-bracket syntax for animations.

Right; I don't necessarily have anything against providing a different
syntax for the same functionality.  CSS parsing isn't very hard, but
if it's even easier for many SVG-geared tools to produce or consume a
syntax that looks like XML, so be it.

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 03:02:42 UTC