W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > April 2009

Re: TELECON AGENDA - 29 Apr 2009

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:06:56 -0500
Message-Id: <22C36C30-A241-4171-9230-D0A438B355F8@orbeon.com>
To: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
Regrets for today's call, I am traveling.

-Erik

On Apr 29, 2009, at 12:05 AM, John Boyer wrote:

>
> Regrets so far: None
> Start Time: 10:45am Eastern US (15:45Z, except 14:45Z during US DST)
> Duration: 90 minutes
>
> Previous minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Apr/0010.html
> IRC supplement: http://www.w3.org/2009/04/22-forms-minutes.html
>
> Minute takers rotation list, when not done by Leigh:
> Steven, Erik, Nick, MarkB/Paul, Ulrich/Sebastian, Charlie
>
> Kenneth/MarkS?, Raman?, Susan?, Rafael/Rogelio?
>
> AGENDA ITEMS:
> =============
> * = be ready to discuss
> + = discuss time permitting
>
> Reports, Etc.
> -------------
> Upcoming telecons
>
> Next FtF
>
> The Forms Newsletter/News items
>
> XForms 1.1
> Implementation report progress
>
> XForms Basic 1.0, 1.1
>
> Rich Web Application Backplane
>
>
> Action Items
> ------------
> Action Item List:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Mar/0052.html
>
> Administrative Issues
> ---------------------
> XSLTForms to list of implementations
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Apr/0002.html
>
> Fix our shortname issue
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Nov/0096.html
> http://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions
>
> W3C Spec matrix
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Nov/0071.html
> - Discussed on Nov. 26, 2008
>
>
> PROGRESS ON WORKING GROUP GOALS
> ===============================
>
> Issue Classification
> ----------------------
>
> * XForms 1.1 Completion
> -----------------------
> * Issues
> - - - -
> - When to use resource attribute
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Mar/0028.html
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2009Mar/0000.html
>
> * Test suite changes
> - - - - - - - - - -
> - Modifications from action items on various group members
>
> - Non-XHTML in test suite
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Apr/0011.html
>
> - What are the remaining obstacles to XForms 1.1 advancement?
>
> 3.3.1.c3 Multiple schemas single namespace (have one, need one)
> 4.2.4.a xforms-model-destruct after submission (have one, need one)
> 8.1.a navindex and accesskey (have one, need one)
>
> 8.1.6.a mediatype attribute on upload (have one, need one)
> 8.1.6.b incremental attribute on upload (have one, need one)
> 8.1.6.d data binding restriction for upload (have one, need one)
> 8.1.10.a selection attribute on select (have one, need one)
>
> 10.4.f delete action and repeat element (need two)
> 11.1.v includenamespaceprefixes attr on submission (have one, need  
> one)
>
> 11.9.p mailto multipart-post submission (have none, need one?)
> 11.9.q mailto form-data-post submission (have one, need zero?)
>
> 11.9.4.b delete submission deletes a file (have none, need one?)
>
>
>
> Advancing XForms for HTML
> -------------------------
> - Assertions
> - Examples
> - Test Suite
>
> - Rationalization of XForms for HTML, RDFa, and ARIA
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Mar/0044.html
>
> * XForms 1.2 Features
> ---------------------
> - Context everywhere, context on bind
> - Data driven switch
> - case()
> - Better expression of default trigger
> - submissions that put and get binary resources
> - setting submission method default to "get"
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0065.html
> - Ability to suppress RRRR on submission completion
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Mar/0007.html
> - Lazy authoring improvement: empty instance exists even if no refs
>
> - repeat and relevance/enabled/disabled
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Mar/0007.html
>
>
> Review Possibilities
> JSON submissions?
> submission to a "new" window?
> mediatype="text/html" on textarea for rich text content?
> XML Events 2?
> Dialogs?
> Model improvements (optional, nested, external/src, exceptions)?
> UI event notification improvements?
> See older issues below?
>
> Analyzing Modularization for AJAX Programmers
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Modularization of XForms based on markup seemed at one point a  
> necessary
> step of decoupling modules against which APIs could be written.
> However, the working group now wants to approach the problem by  
> starting
> with the needed APIs and letting the modularization requirements  
> follow.
>
> XForms 2.0
> ----------
>
> Refactor dependencies to detect automatic rebuild conditions and  
> reduce circular dependencies
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/att-0069/2008-05-28.html#topic6
>
> Review possibilities
>
> Older issues
> ------------
> Currency data values, etc.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Sep/0041.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Sep/0043.html
>
> Validity notification on initial or hidden data
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2008May/0015.html
> - Isn't it about time we add an xforms-control-initialize event?
> - Seems we need it for modularization to work right
> - Defer to face to face meeting
>
> The xforms-link-exception
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2008Aug/0001.html
> Discussed Aug. 20, 2008. Need to dispatch xforms-link-error to
> instance rather than link-exception to model. For legacy, if the
> link-error bubbles up to model, it could throw link-exception, but
> then the author can prevent the exception by cancelling the error
> Note: xforms-link-error is not currently cancellable
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2008Aug/0003.html
>
> xforms-submit-done response-body and host language submission result  
> targeting
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0048.html
> Discussed 21 May 2008; perhaps only for replace="none"
> Concern was about efficiency.  Could add "want-response-body"  
> default false in
> xforms-submit, then if turned true the response-body would be non- 
> empty in the
> xforms-submit-done.  Host language could then push response-body  
> content to
> a new window.
>
> xforms-submit-serialize receives empty submission-body value
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Nov/0061.html
> Discussed 03 Dec 2008; decided to allow future version feature that
> helps control whether submission body is empty on start
> Context info of xforms-submit could provide a writable flag
>
>
> =============================================
>
> [[Magic for irc channel:
>
> /invite zakim
> zakim, this will be forms
> /invite rrsagent
> rrsagent, make log public
>
> Meeting: Weekly Forms WG Teleconference
> Agenda: <url of this message>
> Chair: <whoever>
> Scribe: <whoever> (use exact IRC name, or add "scribenick: irc_name")
> Regrets: <name>, <name>, ...
> Topic: <topic 1>
> ... minutes ...
> Resolution: ... resolution ...
> Topic: <topic 2>
> ...
> ACTION: <someone> to <something>
> ...
>
> Use sed edits to fix previous lines, like s/Steve/Steven/
>
> *** AT THE END OF THE CALL, rrsagent will list the actions by typing
> actions?
>
> *** Zakim will announce who was present by typing
> zakim, bye
>
> *** rrsagent dismissal
> rrsagent, make minutes
> rrsagent, bye
>
> *** If someone by chance dismisses rrsagent before the minutes
> *** are made, just invite rrsagent back
>
> ]]

--
Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way
http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 12:07:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 October 2013 22:06:50 UTC