W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-evangelist@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Valid XML

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 22:52:25 +0100
Message-ID: <428D0A99.1000009@splintered.co.uk>
To: "'public-evangelist@w3.org' w3. org" <public-evangelist@w3.org>

Karl Dubost wrote:

> Maybe a more interesting question would be if as you say we focus on  
> _real world_ usage:
> 
> What are the problems of XHTML 1.0 which makes it impossible to use  in 
> your Web site?

WYSIWYG tools, or even "out of the box" textarea enhancements (when 
talking about CMSs) which do not understand it, and stubbornly output 
something that couldn't even be classed as valid HTML 4...

-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
_____________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2005 21:52:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:19 UTC