public-evangelist@w3.org from May 2005 by thread

HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 Ideas Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 25 May)

• Re: HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 Ideas Jim Ley (Thursday, 26 May)

WaSP Asks the W3C (2005) Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 25 May)

• Object Element Re: WaSP Asks the W3C (2005) Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 25 May)
  • Re: Object Element Re: WaSP Asks the W3C (2005) Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 25 May)
    • Re: Object Element Re: WaSP Asks the W3C (2005) Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 25 May)
      • Re: Object Element Re: WaSP Asks the W3C (2005) Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 26 May)
    • Re: Object Element Re: WaSP Asks the W3C (2005) Stephanie Troeth (Wednesday, 25 May)
      • Re: Object Element Re: WaSP Asks the W3C (2005) Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 26 May)
        • Re: Object Element Re: WaSP Asks the W3C (2005) Stephanie Troeth (Thursday, 26 May)

WaSP asks W3C: The Object element, part 2 Stephanie Troeth (Wednesday, 25 May)

• Re: WaSP asks W3C: The Object element, part 2 Karl Dubost (Wednesday, 25 May)

Re: Valid XML Bjoern Hoehrmann (Wednesday, 18 May)

• RE: Valid XML Brian Kelly (Thursday, 19 May)
  • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Thursday, 19 May)
    • Re: Valid XML Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 19 May)
      • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Friday, 20 May)
        • Re: Valid XML Jim Ley (Friday, 20 May)
          • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Friday, 20 May)
          • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Friday, 20 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Pid (Friday, 20 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Saturday, 21 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Patrick H. Lauke (Saturday, 21 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Saturday, 21 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Patrick H. Lauke (Saturday, 21 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Jim Ley (Sunday, 22 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Pid (Saturday, 21 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Jim Ley (Sunday, 22 May)
            • Re: Valid XML Jim Ley (Sunday, 22 May)
          • Re: Valid XML Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 20 May)
        • Re: Valid XML Brian Kelly (Friday, 20 May)
    • Re: Valid XML Jim Ley (Thursday, 19 May)
  • RE: Valid XML Patrick Lauke (Friday, 20 May)
    • Re: Valid XML Jim Ley (Friday, 20 May)
      • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Friday, 20 May)
        • Re: Valid XML Bjoern Hoehrmann (Friday, 20 May)
          • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Friday, 20 May)
        • Re: Valid XML Jim Ley (Friday, 20 May)
  • RE: Valid XML Patrick Lauke (Friday, 20 May)
    • Re: Valid XML Jim Ley (Friday, 20 May)
      • Re: Valid XML Karl Dubost (Friday, 20 May)
• Re: Valid XML Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 25 May)

A List Apart article on Custom DTDs Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (Wednesday, 18 May)

[Fwd: [W3Qc-public] XHTML] Vincent François (Friday, 6 May)

• Re: [Fwd: [W3Qc-public] XHTML] Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 6 May)
• XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Karl Dubost (Sunday, 8 May)
  • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Brian Kelly (Sunday, 8 May)
    • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 8 May)
    • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Jim Ley (Sunday, 8 May)
      • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Rimantas Liubertas (Sunday, 8 May)
        • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Andrew Cunningham (Monday, 9 May)
          • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 9 May)
            • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Andrew Cunningham (Monday, 9 May)
            • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Jim Ley (Monday, 9 May)
        • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Jim Ley (Monday, 9 May)
  • RE: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Patrick Lauke (Monday, 9 May)
    • Re: XHTML 1.0 versus HTML 4.01 Jim Ley (Monday, 9 May)
      • Could somebody tell which version does WAP 2.0 support? Collin Hsu (Sunday, 15 May)
        • Re: Could somebody tell which version does WAP 2.0 support? olivier Thereaux (Sunday, 15 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 26 May 2005 19:43:12 UTC