Le jeu 16/01/2003 à 12:17, Tom Gilder a écrit : > What about having working groups being required to issue a monthly > newsletter stating what they have done in plain English? Requesting > feedback on issues? Being a participant in a WG, I can assure you that the fact that WG have to publish a draft every 3 months (as required by W3C Process Document) is already a very heavy requirement compared to the resources available in WGs. I'm sure that most WG do their best to reply to any issue raised in the right forum, to document their issues resolution and to highlight their open issues in their draft, but requiring them to have more formal communications on all the front is unlikely to happen due to resources constraint. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Thursday, 16 January 2003 08:40:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 30 October 2009 16:36:52 GMT