W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-evangelist@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XHTML 2.0 and Semantics

From: Tom Gilder <tom@tom.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:17:12 +0000
Message-ID: <1153982977.20030116111712@tom.me.uk>
To: public-evangelist@w3.org

On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 4:40:23 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> This not testable and, hence, is not enforceable, of course. There is
> no way to verify whether _all_ raised issues were addressed because
> there is no practical way to find _all_ raised issues unless WG
> maintains an apropriate interface, such as a bugzilla database (in
> addition to informal mailing lists).

I feel interaction between working groups and the general public could
be improved dramatically.

What about having working groups being required to issue a monthly
newsletter stating what they have done in plain English? Requesting
feedback on issues?

Other than answering questions on the public mailing lists and drafts
from time to time, I feel we actually get reasonably little feedback
directly from the WGs.

And also, couldn't we have scheduled real-time public meetings? Public
IRC discussions? That would allow direct conversation and interaction
between members and the public, and would be fantastic imo.

Tom Gilder
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 06:17:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:17 UTC