W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-evangelist@w3.org > January 2003

Re: XHTML 2.0 and Semantics

From: TeMPeST <tempest@subspace.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 07:16:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <007e01c2bd59$14609c50$0200a8c0@alek>
To: <public-evangelist@w3.org>




ye, use EIRC for a webchat discussion (altho it needs an ircd on the
webserver)... easier than pointing people to mirc etc etc...

i have this set up already.. would be happy to set up a w3.org channel/page
to invite people to...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Gilder" <tom@tom.me.uk>
To: <public-evangelist@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0 and Semantics


>
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 4:40:23 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > This not testable and, hence, is not enforceable, of course. There is
> > no way to verify whether _all_ raised issues were addressed because
> > there is no practical way to find _all_ raised issues unless WG
> > maintains an apropriate interface, such as a bugzilla database (in
> > addition to informal mailing lists).
>
> I feel interaction between working groups and the general public could
> be improved dramatically.
>
> What about having working groups being required to issue a monthly
> newsletter stating what they have done in plain English? Requesting
> feedback on issues?
>
> Other than answering questions on the public mailing lists and drafts
> from time to time, I feel we actually get reasonably little feedback
> directly from the WGs.
>
> And also, couldn't we have scheduled real-time public meetings? Public
> IRC discussions? That would allow direct conversation and interaction
> between members and the public, and would be fantastic imo.
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Tom Gilder
> http://tom.me.uk/
>
>
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 07:18:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 July 2011 00:13:21 GMT