W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > October 2005

RE: [PORT] new editor's working draft of SKOS Core Vocab Spec

From: <tiago.murakami@itau.com.br>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 14:36:31 -0300
To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB1C4FFCA.A6C99F28-ON83257092.006005C3-83257092.0060B824@banco.itau.com.br>


Hi All,

There is a problem: Folksonomies are not a Controlled Vocabulary.

Tiago









                                                                                                              
                      "Miles, AJ                                                                              
                      \(Alistair\)"              To:       "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>                     
                      <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk        cc:       <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>  
                      >                          Subject:  RE: [PORT] new editor's working draft of SKOS Core 
                      Sent by:                    Vocab Spec                                                  
                      public-esw-thes-req                                                                     
                      uest@w3.org                                                                             
                                                                                                              
                                                                                                              
                      06/10/2005 14:25                                                                        
                                                                                                              
                                                                                                              






Hey Dan,

>
> The negotiation is by language prefs from the browser,
> not (to be pedantic) by country, right? So a Dutch speaker
> in France can get Dutch, if they configure things properly.

Yep, depends on the 'Accept-Language:' header sent by the browser.

> One tiny edit. Instead of...
>
> "SKOS Core is a model for expressing the structure and content of
> concept schemes (thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading
> lists, taxonomies, terminologies, glossaries and other types of
> controlled vocabulary)."
>
> How about
>
> "SKOS Core is a model for expressing the structure and content of
> concept schemes (thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading
> lists, taxonomies, 'folksonomies', terminologies, glossaries
> and other
> types of controlled vocabulary)."
>
> If "folksonomy" proves to become a dated buzzword, we can
> remove it in a
> later version. Would be good for W3C to go on record as
> asserting SKOS's
> relevant there, though. In the Guide too, and other
> occurances of this
> abstract.

I'm happy to add this.

Cheers,

Al.





Esta mensagem e uma correspondencia reservada. Se voce a recebeu por engano, por favor desconsidere-a. 
O sistema de mensagens da Internet nao e considerado seguro ou livre de erros. Esta instituicao nao se
responsabiliza por opinioes ou declaracoes veiculadas atraves de e-mails.
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 17:36:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:54 GMT