RE: SKOS public working drafts

I support this change as well, dcmitype:image seems better than using FOAF.

Andy. 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ (Alistair)
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 7:19 AM
To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Subject: RE: SKOS public working drafts


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Søren Roug [mailto:Soren.Roug@eea.eu.int]
> Sent: 07 June 2005 15:11
> To: Miles, AJ (Alistair)
> Subject: RE: SKOS public working drafts
> 
> I'm surprised the altSymbol has foaf:Image as range. The Image class 
> in http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/ seems more appropiate. After all, 
> Dublin Core elements are more likely to be known by thesauri 
> developers than FOAF.

I'd be willing to support this change, if other's agreed this was a good idea.

Cheers,

Al.