W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > June 2005

Re: SKOS public working drafts

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:31:26 +0100
Message-ID: <42C07E3E.8080109@w3.org>
To: "Houghton,Andrew" <houghtoa@oclc.org>
Cc: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org

Houghton,Andrew wrote:

>I support this change as well, dcmitype:image seems better than using FOAF.
>  
>
FWIW I'll make foaf:Image a subclass of the dc image class

 ie. <dcterms:DCMIType rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Image">

...since images are slightly closer to DC's core business than FOAF's. 

Dan



>Andy. 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ (Alistair)
>Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 7:19 AM
>To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
>Subject: RE: SKOS public working drafts
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: S�ren Roug [mailto:Soren.Roug@eea.eu.int]
>>Sent: 07 June 2005 15:11
>>To: Miles, AJ (Alistair)
>>Subject: RE: SKOS public working drafts
>>
>>I'm surprised the altSymbol has foaf:Image as range. The Image class 
>>in http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/ seems more appropiate. After all, 
>>Dublin Core elements are more likely to be known by thesauri 
>>developers than FOAF.
>>    
>>
>
>I'd be willing to support this change, if other's agreed this was a good idea.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Al.
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 22:31:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:53 GMT