Re: RESPONSE REQUESTED by 26 July: EO Materials co-editors: greetings, thanks and next steps

Hey Susan,

Thanks so much for your positive and helpful response. Coffee delivery
confirmed, just need an address and a schedule. I love to serve :)

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Susan Hewitt <susan.hewitt@deque.com>
wrote:

>
> 1. Please confirm that you can undertake this role and commit the time to
> completing it in the timeframe indicated (note that not all resources must
> be completed pre-launch).
>
> Yes
>
> 2. Have you communicated with your co-editor? with your review team?
>
> Only Charlotte. I will reach out to the reviewers after she and I meet
> next week.
>
> 3. When can we expect to see your plan/timeline for edits, review cycles,
> and submission for EOWG approval of the resource(s) assigned to you?
>
> Unsure until I can discuss with Charlotte (she's on vacation this week.)
>
> 4. What additional support would you like to have?
>
> Coffee delivered when needed.
>
> 5. Any other questions or comments?
>
> Not yet.
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> First and most important - thank you for your help in revising the WAI
>> materials to update/polish/revise them for the relaunching of the WAI web
>> site in November. This is an enormous task and could not be done without
>> your help - thanks again!
>>
>> You are BCC'd on this message if you have been assigned as co-editor on
>> one or more of the EO resources needing review and revision. The assignment
>> list is a Google sheet found here:EOWG Resource Management Assignments
>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nJb1_PNbT6bMEz0AuWA1HRj-w2LeujXMatvmajYS4is/edit?usp=sharing>
>>
>> The assignments were largely based on survey responses.However a few
>> holes were left and we filled those with names of those of you who did not
>> complete the survey. So confirmation is required in some cases.
>>
>> Additionally, we introduced a detailed Guidance for Editing and Review
>> teams
>> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/EOWG_Participation_Info#Editing_and_Review_Teams>
>> that might help you determine your approach to the task. One editor's
>> approach to engage her review team is here: [Intro doc] Ready review #1
>> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-eo-archive/2017JulSep/0000.html>
>> Once you have a sense of your approach and the timing for your work, please
>> respond to this list and answer these questions:
>>
>> 1. Please confirm that you can undertake this role and commit the time to
>> completing it in the timeframe indicated (note that not all resources must
>> be completed pre-launch).
>>
>> 2. Have you communicated with your co-editor? with your review team?
>>
>> 3. When can we expect to see your plan/timeline for edits, review cycles,
>> and submission for EOWG approval of the resource(s) assigned to you?
>>
>> 4. What additional support would you like to have?
>>
>> 5. Any other questions or comments?
>>
>> Thanks again, we look forward to hearing from you and facilitating
>> efficient production of these valuable resources. I am more grateful than I
>> can say and thrilled to be in such great company doing such important
>> work!
>>
>> Onward!
>> Sharron and Brent
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> susan hewitt
> senior accessibility specialist
> deque systems
>
>


-- 
Sharron Rush | Executive Director | Knowbility.org | @knowbility
*Equal access to technology for people with disabilities*

Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2017 20:13:43 UTC