W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-egov-ig-etf@w3.org > September 2009

Re: ETF - help! RE: Updated Data.gov memo

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:19:17 -0400
To: "Jose M. Alonso" <josema@w3.org>
cc: Hugh Barnes <Hugh.Barnes@nehta.gov.au>, Rachel Flagg <rachel.flagg@hud.gov>, public-egov-ig-etf@w3.org
Message-ID: <13152.1252336757@waldron>

> El 04/09/2009, a las 14:42, Hugh Barnes escribi=F3:
> > Rachel wrote on Fri 4/09/2009 5:47 AM:
> >
> > >Hugh has graciously volunteered to do the HTML work on this doc - =20
> > so, Hugh, I believe you can >start work on this now...just recognize =20=
> 
> > that the references at the end are still being populated.  >If any =20
> > of you would like to assist Hugh, reply back to this email & let us =20=
> 
> > know.
> >
> > Thanks for confirming this, Rachel. It can be hard to be sure =20
> > exactly what I committed to in those calls (they are too late for me).
> >
> 
> :)
> 
> Formatting the Google document according to the W3C document format =20
> and Manual of Style, such as the one of the Group Note.
> 
> > Will send this to you by the end of my weekend, hopefully. As I =20
> > understand it, that's within your expectations?
> >
> Yup, is it available somewhere?
> Today (Monday) is a holiday in the U.S.
> Tomorrow (Tuesday) is a local holiday for me.
> 
> Unless the document is already properly formatted, it would be nearly 
> impossible for Sandro to publish it tomorrow...

Hugh did the basic formatting, but we're still missing various editorial
bits, like the references section.  If I don't have them in the next few
hours, it's unlikely we'll be able to proceed on the planned schedule.

Alternatively, I suppose we could publish with references TBD, but I'm
not really happy with that idea.  Glossary TBD is more okay.

     -- Sandro
Received on Monday, 7 September 2009 15:19:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 September 2009 15:19:29 GMT