W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)

From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:52:46 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-459502140-1548967965-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@aisaac just use the gh-pages link now that the branch has been merged: https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/resource_roles.html

Aggregated Constraints are just narrower than Full Constraints with Full Constraints serving as a ‘central’ constraints Resource.

I also removed Validation and Conformance Test which just duplicated Full Constraints in intention so now, for constraints, there is way to emulate centrality via completeness.

@kcoyle re your “non-actionable PDF” example: there is a Specification role and you can use that to indicate precisely what you described.

@kcoyle re multiple Full Constraints resources (ShEx, SHACL etc.): just use Full Constraints role multiple times! It’s just like a book with ONE title oh but it’s given in English and Dutch.

So I think the Roles approach works well here!

If we do as @aisaac suggests and move some roles into the Ontology document, we can include examples there of use to cover these cases.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/597#issuecomment-459502140 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2019 20:52:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:06 UTC