W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] Create a use case and requirement for "central" authoritative validation rules (#597)

From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:52:46 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-459502140-1548967965-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@aisaac just use the gh-pages link now that the branch has been merged: https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profilesont/resource_roles.html

Aggregated Constraints are just narrower than Full Constraints with Full Constraints serving as a ‘central’ constraints Resource.

I also removed Validation and Conformance Test which just duplicated Full Constraints in intention so now, for constraints, there is way to emulate centrality via completeness.

@kcoyle re your “non-actionable PDF” example: there is a Specification role and you can use that to indicate precisely what you described.

@kcoyle re multiple Full Constraints resources (ShEx, SHACL etc.): just use Full Constraints role multiple times! It’s just like a book with ONE title oh but it’s given in English and Dutch.

So I think the Roles approach works well here!

If we do as @aisaac suggests and move some roles into the Ontology document, we can include examples there of use to cover these cases.

GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/597#issuecomment-459502140 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2019 20:52:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:45:06 UTC