- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 18:19:04 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@smrgeoinfo Thanks, I agree with what you say above. I didn't mean that meaning of dct:Standard is a type, I meant that the role of the class was to set a type, and a class is not a document. Obviously I wasn't clear. The dct:Standard definition is purposely vague. We had a DCMI discussion about it somewhat recently, and I can't remember now if we made any changes to the definition, but we definitely did not want to equate it with a more rigid ISO definition (e.g. "established by consensus and approved by a recognized body") because that is more formal than DCMI intends. We had a lot of discussion about how people might interpret "recognized body" and that seemed to require a definition of its own. I would rather go with your pragmatic approach. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/722#issuecomment-459449765 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2019 18:19:05 UTC