W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [dxwg] Are the main prof: classes association-classes? (#638)

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 20:31:22 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-452845628-1547065878-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Just to be clear, this issue is about which of these implementation patterns makes the most sense: 

1. denote the resource description with the URI of the artefact:
```
<https://practicalprovenance.wordpress.com/2016/05/07/tracking-versions-with-pav/>
  rdf:type prof:ResourceDescriptor ;
  dct:format <https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/html> ;
  prof:hasRole roles:Guidance ;
.
```
2.  GIve the resource description its own URI, and provide a link to the actual artefact:
```
:pav-blogpost
  rdf:type prof:ResourceDescriptor ;
  dct:format <https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/html> ;
  prof:hasRole roles:guidance ;
  prof:hasArtifact <https://practicalprovenance.wordpress.com/2016/05/07/tracking-versions-with-pav/> ;
  dct:created "2016-05-07" ;
.
```
Under pattern 1. the role is intrinsic to the resource. 
Under pattern 2. the role is attached to the association. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/638#issuecomment-452845628 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2019 20:31:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 March 2019 10:33:28 UTC