W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

RE: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:07:57 +0000
To: <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <75ba9767301143a388e3fd00f07cfc0b@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
Thanks Antoine - 

Yeah - I created a few 'milestones' a few weeks ago because the labels had gotten out of control. (milestones seem to work like labels). 

Then I deleted the unused labels a couple of weeks ago already - about 20 - so it was even worse prior to that!  

Your review looks more systematic. 
I'm happy to change as suggested except also need to check that it doesn't break the links here: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/DCAT_Vocabulary_team_working_space#Resources


-----Original Message-----
From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] 
Sent: Wednesday, 9 May, 2018 10:57
To: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)

Hi everyone,

I’ve gone through all our labels:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels?page=1&sort=name-asc


I have replaced content_negotiation by profile_negotiation https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/profile_negotiation


While I was at it, I’ve gone through all labels and their associated issues. Many are just fine. I am grouping the others in three groups:
- Labels proposed for deletion: they do not act very efficiently as ‘clusters’ - they look much less important than others
- Suggested renaming
- Requiring clarification

What do you think?

Antoine

=== Labels proposed for deletion:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/access-restrictions

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/aggregate

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/coverage

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/cc-rel

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/data_cube

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/dataset (too generic? unless this is dcat:Dataset, in which case it should be renamed, also to match the convention for other DCAT elements) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/distribution (unless this is dcat:Distribution, in which case it should be renamed, also to match the convention for other DCAT elements) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/documentation (too vague/big cluster) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/federation%20and%20citation

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/formal%20description (I’m not sure why it’s used for some issues and not others) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/meta-level%20%26%20methodology (I’m not sure we need a view on this across our milestones) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/meta (same as meta-level; actually I don’t understand why we’d need these two) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/odrl

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/publication

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/representation

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/resolution

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/semantics (a lot of what we do would be about semantics) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/space

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/time

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/void



=== Suggested renaming:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/alignment -> dcat_alignment (to make it clearer what it is) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/catalog -> dcat_catalog https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/service -> dcat_service ?

=== Requiring clarification:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/referencing

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/status

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/usage%20control vs https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/usage_control

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/versioning vs https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/version




On 08/05/18 11:40, Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> ACTION-109:  to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/109

> 
> On: Antoine Isaac
> Due: 2018-05-15
> 
> If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group, please update your settings at:
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/users/39566#settings

> 

Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2018 10:08:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:44:59 UTC