W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:56:30 +0200
To: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <d90cdcd0-032c-7e59-18b1-42dfac1de291@few.vu.nl>
Hi everyone,

I’ve gone through all our labels:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels?page=1&sort=name-asc

I have replaced content_negotiation by profile_negotiation
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/profile_negotiation

While I was at it, I’ve gone through all labels and their associated issues. Many are just fine. I am grouping the others in three groups:
- Labels proposed for deletion: they do not act very efficiently as ‘clusters’ - they look much less important than others
- Suggested renaming
- Requiring clarification

What do you think?

Antoine

=== Labels proposed for deletion:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/access-restrictions
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/aggregate
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/coverage
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/cc-rel
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/data_cube
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/dataset (too generic? unless this is dcat:Dataset, in which case it should be renamed, also to match the convention for other DCAT elements)
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/distribution (unless this is dcat:Distribution, in which case it should be renamed, also to match the convention for other DCAT elements)
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/documentation (too vague/big cluster)
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/federation%20and%20citation
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/formal%20description (I’m not sure why it’s used for some issues and not others)
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/meta-level%20%26%20methodology (I’m not sure we need a view on this across our milestones)
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/meta (same as meta-level; actually I don’t understand why we’d need these two)
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/odrl
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/publication
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/representation
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/resolution
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/semantics (a lot of what we do would be about semantics)
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/space
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/time
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/void


=== Suggested renaming:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/alignment -> dcat_alignment (to make it clearer what it is)
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/catalog -> dcat_catalog
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/service -> dcat_service ?

=== Requiring clarification:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/referencing
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/status
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/usage%20control vs https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/usage_control
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/versioning vs https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/version



On 08/05/18 11:40, Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> ACTION-109:  to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/109
> 
> On: Antoine Isaac
> Due: 2018-05-15
> 
> If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group, please update your settings at:
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/users/39566#settings
> 
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2018 08:57:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 April 2019 13:44:59 UTC