W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 14:51:57 +0200
To: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f0bbef06-92a0-966f-0474-a4ac46560259@few.vu.nl>
Hi Simon, all,

Wow, I'm not sure I envy the position you were in when you did this first cleaning work then ;-)

Regarding the changes you suggest, you're very right, we should be careful not to break links.
Looking at the page you've sent:
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/DCAT_Vocabulary_team_working_space#Resources
It seems that the only direct links to issues are:
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3Adcat+
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3Arequirement+label%3Adcat+
These uses the labels that start with "dcat". I'm not suggesting to remove any of these labels, so we should be ok! Actually I suggest to add two!

Another link that indirectly connects to issues is
https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT-Vocabulary-Topics
But the paths to issues there are based on milestones, not labels. So we should be good.

Am I missing anything?

Cheers,

Antoine

On 09/05/18 12:07, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
> Thanks Antoine -
> 
> Yeah - I created a few 'milestones' a few weeks ago because the labels had gotten out of control. (milestones seem to work like labels).
> 
> Then I deleted the unused labels a couple of weeks ago already - about 20 - so it was even worse prior to that!
> 
> Your review looks more systematic.
> I'm happy to change as suggested except also need to check that it doesn't break the links here: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/DCAT_Vocabulary_team_working_space#Resources
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 May, 2018 10:57
> To: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I’ve gone through all our labels:
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels?page=1&sort=name-asc
> 
> I have replaced content_negotiation by profile_negotiation https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/profile_negotiation
> 
> While I was at it, I’ve gone through all labels and their associated issues. Many are just fine. I am grouping the others in three groups:
> - Labels proposed for deletion: they do not act very efficiently as ‘clusters’ - they look much less important than others
> - Suggested renaming
> - Requiring clarification
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Antoine
> 
> === Labels proposed for deletion:
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/access-restrictions
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/aggregate
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/coverage
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/cc-rel
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/data_cube
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/dataset (too generic? unless this is dcat:Dataset, in which case it should be renamed, also to match the convention for other DCAT elements) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/distribution (unless this is dcat:Distribution, in which case it should be renamed, also to match the convention for other DCAT elements) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/documentation (too vague/big cluster) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/federation%20and%20citation
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/formal%20description (I’m not sure why it’s used for some issues and not others) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/meta-level%20%26%20methodology (I’m not sure we need a view on this across our milestones) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/meta (same as meta-level; actually I don’t understand why we’d need these two) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/odrl
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/publication
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/representation
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/resolution
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/semantics (a lot of what we do would be about semantics) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/space
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/time
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/void
> 
> 
> === Suggested renaming:
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/alignment -> dcat_alignment (to make it clearer what it is) https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/catalog -> dcat_catalog https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/service -> dcat_service ?
> 
> === Requiring clarification:
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/referencing
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/status
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/usage%20control vs https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/usage_control
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/versioning vs https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/labels/version
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/05/18 11:40, Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> ACTION-109:  to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/109
>>
>> On: Antoine Isaac
>> Due: 2018-05-15
>>
>> If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group, please update your settings at:
>> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/users/39566#settings
>>
> 
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2018 12:52:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 25 March 2019 10:33:23 UTC