W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Fwd: Re: Action-148

From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 11:21:15 -0700
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <06590989-9107-8550-61bb-248e8e76016b@lbl.gov>
I like the wikipedia one better, too. The dublin core one is not 
describing a technical standard.

-Annette


On 5/20/16 6:51 AM, yaso wrote:
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Action-148
> Resent-Date: 	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 22:51:43 +0000
> Resent-From: 	public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
> Date: 	Mon, 14 Mar 2016 23:51:07 +0100
> From: 	Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
> To: 	public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Re-iterating an earlier recommendation, I do like the first paragraph of Wikipedia's article on technical standards:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_standard
> This could fit well in our context.
> But if people prefer the DC one I can of course perfectly live with it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> On 3/14/16 5:31 PM, yaso wrote:
> > regarding the action-148
> >https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/148
> >
> > my proposal is to adopt this definition for "Standard"
> >http://dublincore.org/documents/2012/06/14/dcmi-terms/?v=terms#Standard
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

-- 
Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 18:21:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 20 May 2016 18:21:49 UTC