W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > February 2015

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the document [Best practices document(s)]

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:55:15 -0300
Message-ID: <CANx1PzzLG+7MO0JbKJqxR8Pq0OfYqscUX-Bp5An-Syp1bcwVHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias.moro@gmail.com>
Cc: Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Carlos,

Thank you very much for your detailed review of the BP document! We're
gonna review the document again and we're gonna try to remove as much
as possible the techonological bias that you mentioned in your
comments. Some parts of the text were changed already, but we're gonna
make another review.

I have a comment about vocabularies and data models, but I'm gonna
discuss this in a more appropriate thread, ok?

Cheers,
Bernadette







2015-01-30 10:51 GMT-03:00 Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias.moro@gmail.com>:
> Hi Caroline and everyone,
>
> Sorry but the belated response, but I was heavily traveling during the week
> (hint: ccy'ing to the personal email address may also help to get quicker
> responses when you want to address someone specifically :)
> I have just made a quick&dirty review to get you some pointers to specific
> examples. You can see the results at
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ecwweAM5t4UVFEjcXnFhXmCUBnRDvwZ1smRLtiKkBEI/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Sorry for the GDoc, I know it is not really friendly with the W3C archiving
> policy, but this time I just needed to keep this time and effort wise in
> order to keep advancing. Also this has been widely discussed before through
> the mailing list and specific issues raised and tracked, so I expect Phil
> may forgive me just for this time.
>
> Please note that I'm focusing only on the editorial tech-bias review here,
> but my other points and issues raised before [1-6] still remain valid as
> well (although looks like some have been already fixed).
>
> [1] - [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0186.html]
> [2] - [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0225.html]
> [3] - [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0178.html]
> [4] - [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0183.html]
> [5] - [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0264.html]
> [6] - [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0177.html]
>
> Best,
>  CI.
>
>
> On 26 January 2015 at 20:31, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br> wrote:
>>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> would you mind pointing and explaining your view on the technological bias
>> in document? It would be great if you may start this discussion by email.
>>
>> Thank you! Kind regards,
>> Bernadette, Caroline and Newton
>>
>>
>> On 25/01/15 20:36, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue
>> Tracker wrote:
>>>
>>> dwbp-ISSUE-144: There is a technological bias in several parts of the
>>> document [Best practices document(s)]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/144
>>>
>>> Raised by: Carlos Iglesias
>>> On product: Best practices document(s)
>>>
>>> The technological bias in several parts of the document (outside
>>> implementation techniques), and specially in the vocabularies section.
>>>
>>> more details:
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0192.html
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0276.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ---
>
> Carlos Iglesias.
> Internet & Web Consultant.
> +34 687 917 759
> contact@carlosiglesias.es
> @carlosiglesias
> http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en



-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 14:56:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 3 February 2015 14:56:04 UTC