W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"

From: Ig Ibert Bittencourt <ig.ibert@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 12:51:46 -0200
Message-ID: <CAKNDvRX38midrb6x69=Bjrxm2jSSDDeU05eO0z0dDU1CYP1kMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yaso <yaso@nic.br>
Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
+1 to Makx
On Nov 7, 2014 9:49 PM, "Yaso" <yaso@nic.br> wrote:

> +1 to Makx
>
>
> Em 11/7/14, 12:09 PM, Makx Dekkers escreveu:
> > My opinion is that we should not try to redefine what's already
> > well-defined, unless we have a use case that absolutely needs the wider
> > definition. If not, let's stick with the DCAT one.
> >
> > Makx
> > Op 7 nov. 2014 20:07 schreef "Steven Adler" <adler1@us.ibm.com>:
> >
> >> Phil,
> >>
> >> I wasn't privy to the last definition and am 95% fine with the current
> >> one.  But it does feels a little narrow to me.  What about:
> >>
> >> A collection of data, published or curated by one or more agents, and
> >> available for access, use, or download in one or more formats.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"
> >>
> >> [image: Inactive hide details for Phil Archer ---11/07/2014 10:10:03
> >> AM---I tried to word the issue relatively objectively just now in]Phil
> >> Archer ---11/07/2014 10:10:03 AM---I tried to word the issue relatively
> >> objectively just now in tracker,  allowing for the possibility
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    From:
> >>
> >>
> >> Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
> >>
> >>    To:
> >>
> >>
> >> Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
> >>
> >>    Date:
> >>
> >>
> >> 11/07/2014 10:10 AM
> >>
> >>    Subject:
> >>
> >>
> >> Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I tried to word the issue relatively objectively just now in tracker,
> >> allowing for the possibility of the WG to come up with a definition of
> >> 'dataset' other than that in DCAT. More subjectively, I would personally
> >> be very opposed to any such redefinition unless there were very strong
> >> arguments for doing so.
> >>
> >> Phil.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/11/2014 14:25, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue
> >> Tracker wrote:
> >>> ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
> >>>
> >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/80
> >>>
> >>> Raised by:
> >>> On product:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> Phil Archer
> >> W3C Data Activity Lead
> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> >>
> >> http://philarcher.org
> >> +44 (0)7887 767755
> >> @philarcher1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Brazilian Internet Steering Committee - CGI.br
> W3C Brazil Office
> @yaso - yaso.eu
>
> 55 11 5509-3537 (4025)
> skype: yasocordova
>
>
Received on Saturday, 8 November 2014 14:52:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC