W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > November 2014

Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"

From: Adriano C. Machado Pereira <adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 13:10:59 -0200
Message-ID: <CAMDPrXaO25HieECzmjDuRih6z6MJ9F6wTqn7=mXpNeB_Po8WKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ig Ibert Bittencourt <ig.ibert@gmail.com>
Cc: Yaso <yaso@nic.br>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
+1 to Makx

Regards!
--
Adriano C. Machado Pereira.

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Ig Ibert Bittencourt <ig.ibert@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 to Makx
> On Nov 7, 2014 9:49 PM, "Yaso" <yaso@nic.br> wrote:
>
>> +1 to Makx
>>
>>
>> Em 11/7/14, 12:09 PM, Makx Dekkers escreveu:
>> > My opinion is that we should not try to redefine what's already
>> > well-defined, unless we have a use case that absolutely needs the wider
>> > definition. If not, let's stick with the DCAT one.
>> >
>> > Makx
>> > Op 7 nov. 2014 20:07 schreef "Steven Adler" <adler1@us.ibm.com>:
>> >
>> >> Phil,
>> >>
>> >> I wasn't privy to the last definition and am 95% fine with the current
>> >> one.  But it does feels a little narrow to me.  What about:
>> >>
>> >> A collection of data, published or curated by one or more agents, and
>> >> available for access, use, or download in one or more formats.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Steve
>> >>
>> >> Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"
>> >>
>> >> [image: Inactive hide details for Phil Archer ---11/07/2014 10:10:03
>> >> AM---I tried to word the issue relatively objectively just now in]Phil
>> >> Archer ---11/07/2014 10:10:03 AM---I tried to word the issue relatively
>> >> objectively just now in tracker,  allowing for the possibility
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    From:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
>> >>
>> >>    To:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
>> >>
>> >>    Date:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 11/07/2014 10:10 AM
>> >>
>> >>    Subject:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Re: ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I tried to word the issue relatively objectively just now in tracker,
>> >> allowing for the possibility of the WG to come up with a definition of
>> >> 'dataset' other than that in DCAT. More subjectively, I would
>> personally
>> >> be very opposed to any such redefinition unless there were very strong
>> >> arguments for doing so.
>> >>
>> >> Phil.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 07/11/2014 14:25, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue
>> >> Tracker wrote:
>> >>> ISSUE-80: We need a definition of "dataset"
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/80
>> >>>
>> >>> Raised by:
>> >>> On product:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Phil Archer
>> >> W3C Data Activity Lead
>> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>> >>
>> >> http://philarcher.org
>> >> +44 (0)7887 767755
>> >> @philarcher1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brazilian Internet Steering Committee - CGI.br
>> W3C Brazil Office
>> @yaso - yaso.eu
>>
>> 55 11 5509-3537 (4025)
>> skype: yasocordova
>>
>>
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 23:58:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:24:18 UTC