- From: Olle Olsson <olleo@sics.se>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:07:23 +0200
- To: Gavin Treadgold <gt@kestrel.co.nz>
- CC: W3C Disaster Management Ontology List <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>
Gavin Treadgold wrote: > 4. Dependencies. "This will include existing standards groups (eg > OASIS, UN), national emergency management groups, and international > resilience and relief organisations." How about "This will include > existing standards groups (e.g. OASIS, UN), national and international > emergency management groups (e.g. IAEM), and international resilience > and relief organisations." It might almost be appropriate to drop > national emergency management groups as they will give a more > parochial view than an international group would. As I indicated in an earlier message, I regard organisations at the national as important stakeholders. Hence, to exclude this reference is too drastic. I fully expect *all* specific stakeholders to have views that are suboptimal -- national as well as international. The work of the XG is to see what knowledge about the domain exists out there, evaluate it, and see what of this can contribute to emerging standards and what cannot be used. That is, do not a-priori make certain groups/organisations be put out-of-scope. /olle > > Cheers Gavin > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Olle Olsson olleo@sics.se Tel: +46 8 633 15 19 Fax: +46 8 751 72 30 [Svenska W3C-kontoret: olleo@w3.org] SICS [Swedish Institute of Computer Science] Box 1263 SE - 164 29 Kista Sweden ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 13 August 2007 13:07:34 UTC