W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [dpub-loc] Use Cases

From: Peter Krautzberger <peter.krautzberger@mathjax.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:24:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CABqxo80W5mVetj29v8R67T3wVVzBnBzjv=mnB_+8-Q8eYjF6cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Cc: Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
> It is simply unfortunate that github, as an online-only solution, doesn’t
provide me that ability to respond & contribute when disconnected.

While you cannot open issues by email, you can respond to GitHub
notification emails and GitHub will post the email as a response to the
issue, including support for markdown, @mentions etc.

Peter.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
wrote:

> I agree that the organization is very useful.  It is simply unfortunate
> that github, as an online-only solution, doesn’t provide me that ability to
> respond & contribute when disconnected.   I much prefer asynchronous
> solutions be they email, slack – or even gdocs (that has an offline option)
>
> Leonard
>
> From: Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 1:43 PM
> To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
> Cc: W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpub-loc] Use Cases
>
> (sending again to the list)
>
> On 04 Feb 2016, at 08:58, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed the call, as I would have voted against using github in
> this manner.  But since things have already started there, so be it.
>
>
>
> Using the GitHub tracker to discuss use cases individually had been
> "agreed on" (or at least presented) previously, see:
>
>   https://www.w3.org/2016/01/25-dpub-minutes.html#item03
>   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-digipub-ig/2016Jan/0177.html
>
> But -as an editor- I'm open to improving the process if you have
> suggestions. Why would have you voted against?
>
> I find that the tracker helps having organised discussions about
> individual issues. Of course, if one of the discussion diverges to a more
> general or fundamental point, we can always open a new issue or move the
> discussion to the list.
>
> Romain.
>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2016 09:24:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:44:40 UTC