Re: [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 22 January 2015

+Andrey

Sorry, I’ve missed your comments Mats. I think the use-cases doc should be adjusted.

Screen and system locks seem to me rather independent (they are dealing with different subsystems), I don’t see any reason why we should tie them to each other.
We may deal with system locks in exactly the same way as we do for display locks, or may not, but this spec work can safely be done later.

Regards,
Ilya

On 21 янв. 2015 г., at 16:46, Mats Wichmann <mats@osg.samsung.com> wrote:

> On 01/20/15 12:49, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
>> Agenda — Device APIs Working Group — Distributed Meeting 22 January 2015 10-11 ET; meeting details at end of email.
> 
> my apologies for this one, I'm stuck in a three-day meeting and won't
> call in to DAP.
> 
> I haven't seen any reaction to my comment on wake-lock, which was that
> while I have no objection to the proposal itself, the use-case document
> it references for justification includes a claim that any attempt to
> address those issues MUST address at least A and B and our progressing
> spec only addresses A.  Some realignment ought to happen - which might
> be adjusting the use-case doc?
> 
> 
> --mats
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 16:18:53 UTC