- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 16:14:35 +0200
- To: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On May 3, 2012, at 13:07 , JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote: > >> JMCF: Yes, I think this the way to go and as a result it could make sense to concentrate all API efforts under a unique, fresh new WG. And for that WG I would personally prefer the "WebApps WG way of working" i.e. distributed, lightweight and very focused on the work items, based on implementation experience. Having many deliverables is not a problem provided there are editors and people willing to do the spec work, probably based on existing implementations, and implementors supporting such a work I hope you've noticed that the proposed SL WG is drafted to use precisely a WebApps work mode :) It's personally my favoured approach as well, but when we discussed doing the same in DAP the group wasn't enthusiastic about it. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 14:15:08 UTC