W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > May 2012

Re: System Level APIs draft proposal

From: N.V.Balaji <nv.balaji@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 11:03:15 +0530
Message-id: <A83F8A2CF9A4470FABE61051284D7752@sisodomain.com>
To: Doug Turner <dougt@mozilla.com>, Niklas Widell <niklas.widell@ericsson.com>
Cc: "Carr, Wayne" <wayne.carr@intel.com>, "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-device-apis@w3.org
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Doug Turner" <dougt@mozilla.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 10:01 PM
To: "Niklas Widell" <niklas.widell@ericsson.com>
Cc: "Carr, Wayne" <wayne.carr@intel.com>; "Tran, Dzung D" 
<dzung.d.tran@intel.com>; "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>; 
<public-device-apis@w3.org>
Subject: Re: System Level APIs draft proposal

>
> One of my complaints of the DAP was that it was a wide sweeping WG that 
> had way too many deliverables.  I tend to think smaller WGs with tighter 
> focus work a lot better.

I agree. I am not aware of the cost and effort involved in setting up a WG, 
however, small and focused working groups are likely to gather more mass 
than one group with wide spread focus.


> Spawning off a WG to work specially on System Level APIs seems like it is 
> a good thing.  However, I am not sure about all of the politics of 
> something like that.



>
> Doug 
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2012 05:34:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:30 GMT