W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Draft minutes 2010-06-09

From: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:44:34 +0100
Cc: <robin@robineko.com>, <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1CC2D2AC-4CBE-455E-8953-654A6C411F4D@cdt.org>
To: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
To be clear, the position paper CDT submitted to the privacy workshop  
about the rulesets doesn't have any more detail than http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/privacy-rulesets/ 
  . It just has an explanation of the motivation for using rulesets,  
since some readers will not be familiar with DAP and the discussions  
we've all already had about it.

I still think CfC should wait until after the workshop.

Alissa

On Jun 10, 2010, at 12:34 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com 
 > wrote:

> Robin
>
> This sounds like a good plan, and discussing a more detailed  
> Rulesets proposal during the Privacy Workshop should be useful.
>
> Thanks!
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
>
>> On Jun 10, 2010, at 06:36 , <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com 
>> > wrote:
>>> Do we also want to publish CfC for Privacy Rulesets? This might  
>>> make sense to get feedback, especially during privacy workshop...
>>>
>>> Was this discussed on the call yesterday?
>>
>> Yes, though it's possible that some bits of the discussion were  
>> lost because unfortunately Laura's phone connection had some  
>> instabilities while she was scribing. The general idea is that an  
>> extended and more fully described version of the Rulesets has been  
>> submitted to the Privacy Workshop by our friends from CDT. As a  
>> result we were expecting to use the workshop to discuss thoroughly  
>> it before publishing.
>>
>> --
>> Robin Berjon
>> robineko  hired gun, higher standards
>> http://robineko.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 11 June 2010 09:45:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:10 GMT