W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Modal prompts vs notifications (was: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-06-02)

From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:59:16 +0200
To: James Salsman <jsalsman@talknicer.com>
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, public-device-apis@w3.org
Message-ID: <1276091956.2799.2065.camel@localhost>
Le mercredi 09 juin 2010 à 06:49 -0700, James Salsman a écrit :
> Should there be a statement to that effect at the point where prompts
> are discouraged?  I could not find any implication that prompts are
> usually modal -- the issue of non-modality is treated seperately

http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/policy-reqs/#user-control reads 
        "Prompts should be eliminated whenever possible. Many prompts do
        not provide any meaningful security because:
              * they don't provide the user with the information needed
                to make an informed security decision;
              * with modal prompts, the user is inclined simply to
                dismiss the prompt and permit the operation just because
                that's what's needed for the application to continue."
which I think answers your original questions as to why prompts should
be eliminated *whenever* possible.

I guess it could be useful to clarify what is meant by "prompt"; maybe
you could suggest a definition that you think would clarify the document
in light of our exchange?

Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 13:59:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:44 UTC