W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > September 2009

ISSUE-18, List of security policy starting points

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:34:26 -0400
Message-Id: <B0553100-EEC7-44A0-857D-3AED9E16B509@nokia.com>
To: "public-device-apis@w3.org Device APIs and Policy Working Group WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
The Devices API charter lists the following milestone for 3Q09:

"The Working Group reviews and compares existing starting points for  
the various deliverables, and establishes a detailed roadmap."

I have created an issue related to determining our various security  
policy  starting points:

ISSUE-18 - Determine security policy starting points for review and  
comparison

Clearly the list should include the contributions listed on the home  
page [1]:

Nokia contributions
BONDI contributions
I understand that BONDI has been updated to 1.01 [2], including an  
update to the Security and Architecture document. What is necessary to  
formally submit the BONDI 1.01 specifications to the working group?  
(Once submitted we can update the DAP home page accordingly).

We also have inputs from the Workshop, in particular the following:

Nokia position paper by Steve Lewontin, http://www.w3.org/2008/security-ws/papers/SecurityPolicyNokia.pdf

OMTP position paper, , http://www.w3.org/2008/security-ws/papers/OMTP_Security_Position_Paper.pdf

Are there any other position papers or inputs that should be  
considered for evaluation and comparison? Are any updates to  
contributions plan, and if so, when?

Do we have any volunteers to review and compare the inputs?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group

[1]  http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/#specs

[2] http://bondi.omtp.org/1.01/
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 16:35:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:00 GMT