W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Next steps on Capture API?

From: Anssi Kostiainen <anssi.kostiainen@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:52:31 +0200
Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D434F7FA-8F06-4A00-9CCF-FAD34ABDE374@nokia.com>
To: "ext Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
On 8.12.2009, at 20.03, ext Tran, Dzung D wrote:

>  I was wondering what would be our next steps in the Capture API.  
> There are lot of discussions going on in the WG. I think we need to  
> come to a consensus, so that we can make some progress on the API.
>
> Here is a list of all the discussions so far:
> 1. Keep it simple and let all the configurations happen natively in  
> the native Camera Application
> 2. Add configuration options for v1.
> 2. <input type=...> as the API
> 3. http://www.w3.org/mid/AB072C1D-8194-45A8-968E-5E44D3B8F96E@robineko.com
> 4. Adding websocket as a parameter Capture, don't know how this will  
> work.
> 5. Viewfinder in v1?
> ...
> ...anything else that I miss

The Capture API got some public review via Ajaxian (thanks Dion!):

<http://ajaxian.com/archives/w3c-capture-api-our-in-draft>

There are some good comments so I think the spec editors should follow  
up and perhaps invite interested people to join the discussion on this  
list.

-Anssi
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2009 08:52:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:14:03 GMT