Re: Implementation feasibility

>
> >>
> >>> There are several implementations for ShEx, which is a similar
> >>> language to the one described there.
> >
> > ShEx has exclusive or, the core has inclusive or.  This is a significant
> > difference.
> >
> >
> > It has already been said that the people behind ShEx are also members of
> > this WG and that we are open to adapt the language.
>
> What does this have to do with the differences between ShEx and the SHACL
> core?
>

Because you are saying that there is a significant difference between ShEx
and SHACL and I say that the people behind ShEx are flexible enough to
adapt what has been proposed for ShEx to SHACL.

As an example, I am more inclined to have both inclusive and exclusive or,
so the user can chose which one depending on its validation needs.

Best regards, Jose Labra


> peter
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVDY7nAAoJECjN6+QThfjzq4cIANXuMSYq1zQXLF4MDyIHiTlr
> w/9qYvplltB8pYWzTGdl97X3ThvxFfJzL2rIPgpSh8YFlkpUfCIXp/wNtqTP5nnr
> YO70tumDEK9J0xDokG36DBYzzoG7X0jcBeFhQoesft8c1KNplCl32ZL8erGZNLme
> v88BGh2jlo6qdBia37ZvkKUQ1OBmQk/hmk8GIh4UuKev3A09brgtJlsVilJ+UKUj
> zeqBSCK8hsV2BUDMXc4ScN5jTuQ3yFgnuhfYHCJLjE7HQfe/T6E2ogYsl03/ltNs
> imNiDvLXzJOOxWAlXLT8pfHXyUK3BKNegx/COzHcu24WEE25PkF9bdYeyChDw9g=
> =185E
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
-- Jose Labra