public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015 by subject

(no subject)

[SHACL Feedback] Vocabulary for Constraint Violations / security levels

a SHACL specification based on SPARQL

a SHACL specification based on SPARQL - examples

Anyone in support of CONSTRUCT constraints?

Anyone in support of SPARQL ASK constraints?

Changed link to SHACL ED

Comments on Draft

Comments on Draft #2

Comments on draft #3

Core or Lite?

descriptions of SHACL proposal documents

differences between github SHACL spec and my SPARQL-based spec

Ditching the Constraint Violation Vocabulary

Ditching the Constraint Violation Vocabulary (was: Re: Anyone in support of CONSTRUCT constraints?)

documents produced by working group members

Doodle: Link for poll "RDF Data Shapes WG F2F3"

Early feedback on SHACL Spec appreciated

Eric's description of core SHACL

European Data Forum (EDF 2015) - Call for contributions: Deadline 15 May 2015

F2F3 to be in Waterloo

Follow-up on Michel's comment

How would option b) on the last straw poll of 12 March work?

Human-readable error messages in an R2RML validator

I raised some issues

Implementation feasibility

Implementation feasibility (was: Re: Pragmatic Proposal for the Structure of the SHACL Spec)

Implementations without SPARQL

is there an implementation of Shape Expressions that correctly handles recursive shapes?

It's SHACL not SHAQL

Looking at the current proposals for SHACL

Naming of cardinality properties

New user story: S41 Validating schema.org instances against model and metamodel

New user story: S42: Constraining RDF graphs for better mapping to JSON

On the inevitability of SPARQL/SPIN for SHACL

On the inevitability of SPARQL/SPIN for SHAQL

Pragmatic Proposal for the Structure of the SHACL Spec

Proposal to extend weekly call by 30mn

Proposal to extend weekly call by 30mn: APPROVED

Proposals around SPARQL

Question of organization of Requirements wiki page

RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 5 March 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 March 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 March 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 26 March 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 March 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 12 March 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 March 2015

RDFS entailment mandatory? (was: a SHACL specification based on SPARQL)

recursive shapes (and negation)

recursive shapes in SHACL

Regrets for weekly calls

Requirement 2.11.7, Separation of Structural from Complex Constraints

S17: Specify subsets of data

Scoping of constraints (was: a SHACL specification based on SPARQL)

Sections 1 and 2 of SHACL Spec

sh:sparqlFilter (was: On the inevitability of SPARQL/SPIN for SHAQL)

SHACL abstract syntax or functional specification

SHACL language

SHACL semantics - any alternatives to SPARQL?

SHACL specification document

shacl.shacl.ttl

shapes-ACTION-16: Set up doodle poll for date/location of next f2f

shapes-ISSUE-22 (recursion): Treatment of recursive shape definitions [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-25 (core/lite): What's in Core/Lite? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-28 (macros): Is the macro facility part of the high-level language or of the extension mechanism? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-31 (unitary semantics): Is there going to be a single unitary semantics for all of SHACL [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-33: Language Tags [Shacl-Req]

ShEx extensions

ShEx extensions (was: Re: Implementation feasibility)

status of working group documents

STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL

Suggestion: sh:nodeType -> sh:nodeKind

The NoSPARQL use case

The Various Versions of Shape Expressions

UCR FPWD (ready) & regrets for telco today

Value type constraints

What the state of Shape Expressions means to the working group

What was in CONSTRAINTS (was Re: Core or Lite?)

What we voted on at the f2f

xsd:anyURI syntax

xsd:anyURI syntax (was: a SHACL specification based on SPARQL - examples)

Z Errors in Shape Expressions 1.0 Definition

“SHACL Minus SPARQL”

“SHACL Minus SPARQL” (was: Re: On the inevitability of SPARQL/SPIN for SHAQL)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 23:14:59 UTC