public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015 by thread

F2F3 to be in Waterloo Arnaud Le Hors (Tuesday, 31 March)

shapes-ISSUE-33: Language Tags [Shacl-Req] Jose Emilio Labra Gayo (Monday, 30 March)

shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-31 (unitary semantics): Is there going to be a single unitary semantics for all of SHACL [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

I raised some issues Richard Cyganiak (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-28 (macros): Is the macro facility part of the high-level language or of the extension mechanism? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-25 (core/lite): What's in Core/Lite? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

shapes-ISSUE-22 (recursion): Treatment of recursive shape definitions [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Saturday, 28 March)

Naming of cardinality properties Holger Knublauch (Friday, 27 March)

Value type constraints Holger Knublauch (Friday, 27 March)

Suggestion: sh:nodeType -> sh:nodeKind Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 26 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 26 March 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 26 March)

STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 26 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 March 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 25 March)

Anyone in support of CONSTRUCT constraints? Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 24 March)

Implementations without SPARQL Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 24 March)

descriptions of SHACL proposal documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 24 March)

status of working group documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 24 March)

What we voted on at the f2f Karen Coyle (Tuesday, 24 March)

The Various Versions of Shape Expressions Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 23 March)

SHACL language Jose Emilio Labra Gayo (Monday, 23 March)

shacl.shacl.ttl Karen Coyle (Saturday, 21 March)

is there an implementation of Shape Expressions that correctly handles recursive shapes? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 20 March)

Implementation feasibility (was: Re: Pragmatic Proposal for the Structure of the SHACL Spec) Dimitris Kontokostas (Friday, 20 March)

Follow-up on Michel's comment Holger Knublauch (Friday, 20 March)

Looking at the current proposals for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 20 March)

Core or Lite? Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 19 March)

Comments on draft #3 Karen Coyle (Thursday, 19 March)

documents produced by working group members Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 19 March)

Human-readable error messages in an R2RML validator Richard Cyganiak (Thursday, 19 March)

UCR FPWD (ready) & regrets for telco today Simon Steyskal (Thursday, 19 March)

Z Errors in Shape Expressions 1.0 Definition Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 19 March)

Anyone in support of SPARQL ASK constraints? Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 19 March)

Pragmatic Proposal for the Structure of the SHACL Spec Arthur Ryman (Wednesday, 18 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 March 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 18 March)

Comments on Draft #2 Karen Coyle (Tuesday, 17 March)

Comments on Draft Karen Coyle (Monday, 16 March)

Regrets for weekly calls Iovka Boneva (Friday, 13 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 12 March 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 12 March)

How would option b) on the last straw poll of 12 March work? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 12 March)

New user story: S42: Constraining RDF graphs for better mapping to JSON Richard Cyganiak (Thursday, 12 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 March 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 12 March)

S17: Specify subsets of data Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 11 March)

Fw: Doodle: Link for poll "RDF Data Shapes WG F2F3" Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 11 March)

Proposals around SPARQL Richard Cyganiak (Monday, 9 March)

SHACL semantics - any alternatives to SPARQL? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 6 March)

Sections 1 and 2 of SHACL Spec Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 5 March)

Proposal to extend weekly call by 30mn Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 5 March)

differences between github SHACL spec and my SPARQL-based spec Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 5 March)

RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 5 March 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 5 March)

Question of organization of Requirements wiki page Richard Cyganiak (Thursday, 5 March)

shapes-ACTION-16: Set up doodle poll for date/location of next f2f RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 5 March)

New user story: S41 Validating schema.org instances against model and metamodel Richard Cyganiak (Thursday, 5 March)

Requirement 2.11.7, Separation of Structural from Complex Constraints Richard Cyganiak (Thursday, 5 March)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 March 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 4 March)

a SHACL specification based on SPARQL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 3 March)

It's SHACL not SHAQL Arnaud Le Hors (Monday, 2 March)

SHACL abstract syntax or functional specification Jose Emilio Labra Gayo (Monday, 2 March)

[SHACL Feedback] Vocabulary for Constraint Violations / security levels Dimitris Kontokostas (Sunday, 1 March)

The NoSPARQL use case Richard Cyganiak (Sunday, 1 March)

European Data Forum (EDF 2015) - Call for contributions: Deadline 15 May 2015 Axel Polleres (Sunday, 1 March)

Re: On the inevitability of SPARQL/SPIN for SHAQL Holger Knublauch (Sunday, 1 March)

Re: Early feedback on SHACL Spec appreciated Holger Knublauch (Sunday, 1 March)

Changed link to SHACL ED Holger Knublauch (Sunday, 1 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 23:14:59 UTC