- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:07:07 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 3/19/15 7:44 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > By the way I have also restructured the Overview of the Core Features so > that it is only about *local* constraints. I have moved *global* > constraints to the second half. My gut feeling is that the global constraints will be used most often with the least complex data, and therefore should be in the core. I don't see language that states how to define the desired focus node in the SHACL language, and that should be very early on in the document. Is this because we do not have agreement on that? If so, I would like there be a placeholder, probably in section 3, Shapes. This would define local and global shapes. BTW, the term "local shapes" does not appear anywhere in the document yet. kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Saturday, 21 March 2015 16:07:36 UTC