- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:44:36 -0700
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 My takeaway from Eric's description at http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ is that 1/ informal descriptions can leave quite a bit open (e.g., how recursive shapes are handled) and 2/ going beyond the core (for example to closed shapes) can require significantly different machinery. peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVCCG0AAoJECjN6+QThfjzVWkH/iH0j82U02kpXglkrbkjCBC0 JaRqGxdhEcaYEAiJxv/zqPlKl4yB30Uf9hQouwerUywqeVxb5RvHRK6g/U++nwN2 OlDaNKW8GgjdHuXWRGipUHBkOXvfU114x51u/wofX9sxLCDsXTFCjcC8CxJWk3+J 7ykcIVaMRfuiyYPOrZrmB+IZnMcDpzMh2s87anMvc851tGAB3ZkNOWbKMeKPGpNi EMKgZyjBKX2nN2ycCnEJCsUvxouJa3DsBAU56TXzN9AHmkIN1AGyTGfXFidbrWlM 5u/j/cuiu5mZP1ZtownXrfhBqSHtHmsQ4AIexd9u5LXkYcauzCVDuuIwH5KLzFA= =lUkJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 12:45:10 UTC