- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 06:50:58 -0700
- To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- CC: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/15/2015 11:41 PM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo wrote: [...] > Notice that further extensions to the language could be done using the > same axiomatic semantics. For example, Closed shapes, negations, etc. > could also be defined. I moved those constructs out of the document for > simplicity. > > I have even a draft of constructs to define the extensibility mechanism > and even the macros facility, but I think it is better to start and agree > on a simple core language and add those constructs at due time. My problem with this approach is that the extra constructs may be difficult or impossible to define in a particular approach or may have undesirable characteristics. > Best regards, Jose Labra peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVBt/CAAoJECjN6+QThfjzsB4H/1RSBYKT+GNgjMPorWf78LSN i+A29HEQ8AauEAkWAddS5nvwemQenRL3Vx8+9cSD/qn6eefuLBr5rSVgvvVfjeLC oQFQYgDXgrzXT53RbzdKXXda1J42BJb4TEPlvxO4CPcm9OSSaP7aKdJ6XHhP+G+N Lq86IYICQF9GJwi+K/ci0ua+uo9rOoNX5RwDKg3ln6B0tmelEhGOa9T+mhH3KU09 p+ngaWerEjqmwug+cFbf6Rkwx2Nuss3uyJkx5lCZRPZkb0X6YXh8TxTsrn6HKHVH vMGzC0KSqO2cFst5I9d/GbcXJAukXdUXFFPsxaMgMS9v7K+ZWjtJTyxGMQJlQB8= =LtAa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 13:51:26 UTC