- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:38:37 -0800
- To: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- CC: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 If the language allows SPARQL constructs and closed shapes then it should allow SPARQL constructs in closed shapes. peter On 03/04/2015 09:57 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote: > > On Mar 5, 2015 2:09 AM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" > <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > I think that your method only works for certain shapes. > > Consider, for example, a value of p is b AND a value of p is c OR a value > of q is d > > >> I don't understand this shape, I think this should always fail unless b >> and c are equal. > > The closure filter here is a function of the entire shape. If the shape > includes raw SPARQL code constructing the filter would require a > semantic analysis of the SPARQL code. > >> You are right about SPARQL, it never occurred to me that we would allow >> it in closed shapes. > > > > peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU+IaNAAoJECjN6+QThfjz4aYIANMo3Cx6QJno1mFON4azu7W+ IlYKPQ62KE10rFV9/Jpc91srFFD9VOkQ6pUS/cKQcCzDqv4HkrcKxCqRTnAP84tP Vf7q4l3xrrgPwhDwK2sq2C/IxW26wFbjIF9BA0/alIGWKUqFXXF+jymoGk0vKOQb S6CirRc+1irDhei8lOUX/J21uZl/5LlLCNqJDyCj1HTgsKp7N44vgf4I1Oso0qC2 uLqwDuAIYQXWLsM34erLIw05N0Z6L09l58kRf+jMNV3kIqgJfgFMjWnlX9YQoUF8 Tf+HYdufTKCpb4CheDrSyMO8QOnthXG66T0lE7ZP0Z1SUQOg1+6LbLpEpt3CUAU= =VUVb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2015 16:39:09 UTC