Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type from Holger Knublauch on 2015-01-26 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from January 2015)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:16:33 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <54C5E9D1.1000300@topquadrant.com>

On 1/26/15, 4:56 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
>
> This is exactly how RDFUnit deals with constraint discovery and I 'd 
> definitely +1 this approach
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2014Nov/0245.html

Agreed, and I did not make that connection back then. It looks indeed 
very similar. If you have time, maybe you want to go through the rest of 
the RDFUnit vocabulary to see if LDOM could benefit from other RDFUnit 
features? Maybe you can also help drafting an possible implementation - 
what about ldom:context pointing at ldom:Context instances, which must 
be URIs and may have ldom:subContextOf to form a simple inclusion hierarchy?

Thanks!
Holger

Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 07:17:09 UTC