public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from January 2015 by author

Antonio David Perez Morales

• Interlinked shapes (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Friday, 16 January)
• Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Friday, 16 January)
• Introduction (Thursday, 8 January)

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 29 January 2015 (Friday, 30 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 22 January 2015 (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 29 January 2015 (Thursday, 29 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 29 January 2015 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: F2F wiki page (was Re: regrets for F2F2 physical presence) (Wednesday, 28 January)
• F2F wiki page (was Re: regrets for F2F2 physical presence) (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 22 January 2015 (Thursday, 22 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 22 January 2015 (Wednesday, 21 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 15 January 2015 (Monday, 19 January)
• Re: AW: Re: Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Thursday, 15 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 15 January 2015 (Wednesday, 14 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 8 January 2015 (Friday, 9 January)
• Data Shapes WG Agenda for 8 January 2015 (Wednesday, 7 January)

Arthur Ryman

• RE: shapes and classes: different (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: example of recursive shapes (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: introducing CONSTRAINTS (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-19 (S35 not RDF): S35 appeals to something that is not RDF (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-7 Resource Shapes (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: ACTION-7 Resource Shapes (Thursday, 22 January)
• ACTION-7 Resource Shapes (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: shapes as classes (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: shapes as classes (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-19 (S35 not RDF): S35 appeals to something that is not RDF (Thursday, 8 January)

Axel Polleres

• Re: Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Friday, 9 January)

Dean Allemang

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-11 (S9 impossible): S9 is about existing but unspecified values (Friday, 9 January)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Validation entry points (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-8: Write up rdfunit processing (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-8: Write up rdfunit processing (Tuesday, 13 January)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: On LDOM (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: On LDOM (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: shapes and classes: different (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Monday, 26 January)
• Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: regrets for F2F2 physical presence (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• RE: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: github repo organization (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: github repo organization (Tuesday, 20 January)
• github repo organization (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: AW: Re: Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: User Stories wiki editing conflicts (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: User Stories wiki editing conflicts (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-19 (S35 not RDF): S35 appeals to something that is not RDF (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: User Stories wiki editing conflicts (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: issue status (Friday, 9 January)
• S18: Scope of Export (Thursday, 8 January)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: On LDOM (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: On LDOM (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Wednesday, 28 January)
• LDOM algorithm (very early draft) (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: F2F wiki page (was Re: regrets for F2F2 physical presence) (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: github repo organization (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Tuesday, 27 January)
• How we can all "win" the Classes vs Shapes war (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: The Data Portal use cases (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: github repo organization (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Property groups and Combinations (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: what is LDOM? (was Re: example of recursive shapes) (Sunday, 25 January)
• The Data Portal use cases (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Property groups and Combinations (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Validation entry points (Sunday, 25 January)
• Validation entry points (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: example of recursive shapes (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: example of recursive shapes (Sunday, 25 January)
• New LDOM version 0.1.5 (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: example of recursive shapes (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Property groups and Combinations (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Unbounded repetitions (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Property groups and Combinations (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Interlinked shapes (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Technology Name (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Existing Systems page (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 22 January 2015 (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 22 January 2015 (Thursday, 22 January)
• Introducing LDOM (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Added requirements for node type (Monday, 12 January)
• Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Sunday, 11 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 9 January)
• Added requirements for node type (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: User Stories wiki editing conflicts (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 9 January)
• User Stories wiki editing conflicts (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Monday, 5 January)

Irene Polikoff

• RE: shapes and classes: different (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: shapes and classes: different (Tuesday, 27 January)
• RE: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• RE: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Property groups and Combinations (Sunday, 25 January)
• RE: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• RE: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• RE: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Use Cases vs. User Stories (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 9 January)
• RE: Use Cases vs. User Stories (Friday, 9 January)

Jerven Bolleman

• Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Sunday, 25 January)

Jerven Tjalling Bolleman

• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Monday, 26 January)

Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken

• apologies (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Monday, 5 January)

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

• Re: Definition of Shape (Friday, 30 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 29 January 2015 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 29 January 2015 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Language or technology (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: The Data Portal use cases (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Property groups and Combinations (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Property groups and Combinations (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Property groups and Combinations (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Interlinked shapes (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Unbounded repetitions (was: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM)) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• Definition of Shape (Friday, 23 January)
• New User Story: Validating and describing linked data portals (Friday, 23 January)
• New requirement: separation of structural from complex constraints (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 22 January)
• Introduction (Thursday, 8 January)

Karen Coyle

• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 29 January 2015 (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: On LDOM (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: On LDOM (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: On LDOM (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Bob is not a shape [Was: Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type] (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 22 January)
• Fwd: Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource (Saturday, 10 January)
• Update on Dublin Core progress (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Saturday, 3 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: Definition of Shape (Friday, 30 January)
• S35 status (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: On LDOM (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 29 January 2015 (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: On LDOM (Wednesday, 28 January)
• On LDOM (Wednesday, 28 January)
• Re: Language or technology (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• shapes and classes: different (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: what is LDOM? (was Re: example of recursive shapes) (Monday, 26 January)
• Re: Shapes are Classes, even if you don't use rdf:type (Sunday, 25 January)
• what is LDOM? (was Re: example of recursive shapes) (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: example of recursive shapes (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: example of recursive shapes (Sunday, 25 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• regrets for F2F2 physical presence (Saturday, 24 January)
• example of recursive shapes (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Saturday, 24 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Saturday, 24 January)
• introducing CONSTRAINTS (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Definition of Shape (Friday, 23 January)
• Re: Shapes vs Classes (in LDOM) (Friday, 23 January)
• summary of LDOM (Friday, 23 January)
• ISSUE-20 is solved (Thursday, 22 January)
• Existing Systems page (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: ACTION-7 Resource Shapes (Thursday, 22 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Added Requirement: Static Constraints (Thursday, 22 January)
• ISSUE-18 S35 still not in good shape - constraints (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: ACTION-7 Resource Shapes (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-8: Write up rdfunit processing (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-11 (S9 impossible): S9 is about existing but unspecified values (Thursday, 15 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: User Stories wiki editing conflicts (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: issue status (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-19 (S35 not RDF): S35 appeals to something that is not RDF (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: User Stories wiki editing conflicts (Friday, 9 January)
• issue status (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-18 (S35 examples): S35 needs to state what constraints are required (Friday, 9 January)
• Re: ISSUE-5 Definition of Resource (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-9: Create wiki page for existing systems (Thursday, 8 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Monday, 5 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Sunday, 4 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 2 January)
• Re: Terminology: How to call "IRI or blank node"? (Friday, 2 January)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ACTION-9: Create wiki page for existing systems (Thursday, 8 January)
• shapes-ACTION-8: Write up rdfunit processing (Thursday, 8 January)
• shapes-ACTION-7: For resource shapes (Thursday, 8 January)
• shapes-ACTION-6: And karen will be the editors. they will develop the document by ?? (Thursday, 8 January)

Simon Steyskal

• Re: github repo organization (Tuesday, 27 January)
• Re: github repo organization (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: github repo organization (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: AW: Re: Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Friday, 16 January)
• Re: Use Cases vs. User Stories (Sunday, 11 January)
• RE: Use Cases vs. User Stories (Sunday, 11 January)
• Re: Added requirements for node type (Saturday, 10 January)
• AW: Re: Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Friday, 9 January)
• Use Cases vs. User Stories (Friday, 9 January)
• Versioning (Repository?) for WG Drafts (Friday, 9 January)

Last message date: Friday, 30 January 2015 21:22:45 UTC