W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-csv-wg@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Should we have a 29-04-2015 CSVW call tomorrow?

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:41:11 +0200
Cc: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Message-Id: <DC821D77-3F82-46AD-8D80-9A6611AC4492@w3.org>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>

> On 28 Apr 2015, at 17:35 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Apr 28, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I have time for a short experiment. Would be interested to hear about experience / plans for other implementations. (sadly I have none- but am trying to use the CSVW specs with real data, hence my somewhat complicated rdf data cube example [1]).
> 
> I think meeting regularly, even if for a short call, has value. I’m free tomorrow too.
> 
>> Wonder if it's worth experimenting with Glitter [2] too for IM? (albeit that would make the capture of minutes harder tomorrow)
> 
> I think this would be a good idea. Interestingly, I ran into TimBL at the Extend the Web Summit last week in San Francisco, and he brought out his laptop to show me Gitter! Seems like the way of the future, so experimenting with it now seems like a good idea!
> 

Let us put gitter aside for now; I am happy try it once the telco part works well.

> As for WebEx, I’m not a big fan, but whatever gets the job done. We should try it, and maybe something like Google Hangouts on a different call. I’ve also used Uber Conference (https://www.uberconference.com) for meetings, which might be another alternative.
> 

Google hangouts has an issue: it cannot be called from a phone (at least Dan did not see a possibility for it), and that is a problem. I do not know Uber.

There is always a cost for systems (I do not know Uber). The advantage, from W3C point of view, is that the webex setup is MIT's, which takes over all the costs…

Ivan

> Gregg
> 
>> Jeremy
>> 
>> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/blob/gh-pages/examples/rdf-data-cube-example.md
>> [2]: https://gitter.im/w3c/csvw
>> 
>> On 28 April 2015 at 16:04, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues has nothing flagged as requiring
>> teleconf time, and only 3 editor actions outstanding:
>> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Editor+action%22
>> 
>> #508 Comments on registration template for "application/csvm+json"
>> #505 Specify that 'source number' begins by 1 Editor action For LCCR
>> Model Document
>> #481 Add changes since last WD
>> 
>> Is there appetite or need for a CSVW call tomorrow?
>> 
>> Ivan has also mentioned recently that there is an issue facing up
>> w.r.t. the coming shutdown of Zakim, and suggests we experiment soon
>> with WebEx as a possible replacement teleconf option. Ivan - is it too
>> late to try this for tomorrow? Could we perhaps set up a parallel call
>> and drop back to Zakim if any attendee (who reports problems via
>> IRC/mail) can't get WebEx working?
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704





Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 15:41:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 28 April 2015 15:41:22 UTC