W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-csv-wg@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Editor/spec status check and April 8th call?

From: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:51:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CADtUq_3s80T68-G2SH46aui8zVvLUwWNR4da_PADcJiBVyzSxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Hi - I'll be dialling for tomorrow's call ... back from vacation :-)

I have two outstanding issues [1][2] assigned to me that I should get
resolved tomorrow. Nothing major - so 16th April looks good.

Jeremy

[1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445
[2]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/459

On 7 April 2015 at 15:05, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Dan,
>
> as far as I am concerned, all the issues I raised during my review are
> closed. Ie, if we can handle, both decision wise and editorially, Jeni's
> comments tomorrow, I am o.k. to publish next week.
>
> Ivan
>
> > On 07 Apr 2015, at 15:36 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Last week Ivan, Gregg and I had an informal call.
> >
> > Super brief IRC log here, http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-csvw-irc
> >
> > We talked somewhat more than scribed, but the main point of record was
> > made by Ivan:
> >
> > "we have to be a little more administrative (final reviews etc) in
> > coming period.
> > coming back next week, we might be ready to have a publication on the
> > following tuesday.
> > … aiming at 16th April currently. unless Jeremy or Jeni hits a major
> > issue, it should be doable."
> >
> > Jeni/Jeremy, how are things looking editorially from your side?
> >
> > Those of us who are around - let's have a call tomorrow.
> >
> > Checking in on Github, I see 5 items from Jeni listed as requiring
> > teleconf attention (and none from anyone else):
> >
> >
> https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Requires+telcon+discussion%2Fdecision%22
> >
> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/444 "Should tables have a schema
> annotation?"
> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445 "Row annotations in conversion
> > specifications"
> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/446 "Inherited property annotations
> > on columns"
> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/448 "Is specifying default metadata
> > necessary?"
> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/449 "HTTP headers vs dialects"
> >
> > All of these have had some discussion in Github. Assuming we manage to
> > reach a resolution on each before or during tomorrow's call, does
> > publishing on April 16th still sound feasible? Other editors - can you
> > confirm that you have no further issues requiring teleconf discussion?
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > (around tomorrow, happy to chair)
> >
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 19:51:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 7 April 2015 19:51:33 UTC