W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-csv-wg@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Editor/spec status check and April 8th call?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:56:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=6e8PDmjufmEsn1oQ1mcAzRenpmX-7Tz-oy4sNyaeF6-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C CSV on the Web Working Group <public-csv-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Rough and ready meeting record: http://www.w3.org/2015/04/08-csvw-minutes.html

(I forgot to change scribenick when I took over scribing but the basic
points should be clear enough)

On 7 April 2015 at 20:51, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi - I'll be dialling for tomorrow's call ... back from vacation :-)
>
> I have two outstanding issues [1][2] assigned to me that I should get
> resolved tomorrow. Nothing major - so 16th April looks good.
>
> Jeremy
>
> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445
> [2]: https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/459
>
> On 7 April 2015 at 15:05, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dan,
>>
>> as far as I am concerned, all the issues I raised during my review are
>> closed. Ie, if we can handle, both decision wise and editorially, Jeni's
>> comments tomorrow, I am o.k. to publish next week.
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>> > On 07 Apr 2015, at 15:36 , Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Last week Ivan, Gregg and I had an informal call.
>> >
>> > Super brief IRC log here, http://www.w3.org/2015/04/01-csvw-irc
>> >
>> > We talked somewhat more than scribed, but the main point of record was
>> > made by Ivan:
>> >
>> > "we have to be a little more administrative (final reviews etc) in
>> > coming period.
>> > coming back next week, we might be ready to have a publication on the
>> > following tuesday.
>> > … aiming at 16th April currently. unless Jeremy or Jeni hits a major
>> > issue, it should be doable."
>> >
>> > Jeni/Jeremy, how are things looking editorially from your side?
>> >
>> > Those of us who are around - let's have a call tomorrow.
>> >
>> > Checking in on Github, I see 5 items from Jeni listed as requiring
>> > teleconf attention (and none from anyone else):
>> >
>> >
>> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Requires+telcon+discussion%2Fdecision%22
>> >
>> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/444 "Should tables have a schema
>> > annotation?"
>> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/445 "Row annotations in conversion
>> > specifications"
>> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/446 "Inherited property annotations
>> > on columns"
>> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/448 "Is specifying default metadata
>> > necessary?"
>> > https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/449 "HTTP headers vs dialects"
>> >
>> > All of these have had some discussion in Github. Assuming we manage to
>> > reach a resolution on each before or during tomorrow's call, does
>> > publishing on April 16th still sound feasible? Other editors - can you
>> > confirm that you have no further issues requiring teleconf discussion?
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > (around tomorrow, happy to chair)
>> >
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 18:57:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 April 2015 18:57:22 UTC