Re: [css-writing-modes-3] text-orientation-mixed-001 , text-orientation-010 , text-orientation-014 tests

2015-12-04 7:43 GMT+09:00 Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>:

> Hello,
>
>
> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-mixed-001.xht
>
> The reference image must be redone so that it uses a "Ｔ" (65332) and not a
> "T" (84).
> More info:
>
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/T-in-text-orientation-mixed-001-test.html


I think it's intentional and correct, though I agree that it's not easy to
understand. "T" is in FULL WIDTH T to set in upright. If you change it to
ASCII T, it must set in sideways, and the test is no longer testing "mixed"
value.


> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-010.xht
>
> The second (bottom) part of the test is wrong, not best, not testing what
> it claims to be testing because #test and #control use identical code. The
> initial, default value of 'text-combine-upright' is 'none'; the initial,
> default value of 'text-orientation' is 'mixed'.
>

Huh, agree that this test does not make sense, it only makes sense to who
understands how it should look, and test and ref are not related.


> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/text-orientation-014.xht
>
> The second (bottom) part of the test is wrong, incorrect. The initial,
> default value of 'text-combine-upright' is 'none'; the initial, default
> value of 'text-orientation' is 'mixed'. So, 'sideways' text and 'mixed'
> text are compared.
>

This test is not good, but does not look wrong to me.

/koji