W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > October 2010

RE: content-072.htm is invalid

From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:54:25 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, GĂ©rard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <07349ECFC3608F48BC3B10459913E70B0C582FDB@TK5EX14MBXC140.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Monday, October 25, 2010 1:25 PM Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Arron Eicholz
> <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > Unfortunately we only really have the HTML 4.01 spec to rely on. It's the
> only current HTML Recommendation available for CSS. If HTML5 were at the
> Recommendation stage the discussion would be different but it isn't, and we
> are a long way from that. I am not really trying to argue, in fact I personally
> agree with you about the state of HTML 4.01. CSS just needs to point to a
> certain level of specification as a normative reference and that happens to be
> the current HTML 4.01 spec. Until that changes I see no reason to remove a
> test from the test suite that is a valid HTML markup testing CSS features.
> 
> I don't see any value in process-lawyering here.  If we can't normatively
> reference HTML5 due to W3C process, that means that W3C process is
> broken there.  That's fine, whatever, we've run into these kinds of issues
> before.  What we should *not* do is attempt to test parts of our normative
> references that we know are incorrect, just because they're normative.

There isn't much value in handling this on public-css-testsuite. This issue should be brought up to www-style and you should drive getting the normative reference changed if you think it is necessary.

--
Thanks,
Arron Eicholz



Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 21:55:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 25 October 2010 21:55:08 GMT