W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:21:50 -0800
Message-ID: <00149deb386f68cfea414af4f61a95c5.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "Řyvind Stenhaug" <oyvinds@opera.com>, "Geoffrey Sneddon" <gsneddon@opera.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>

Le Lun 6 décembre 2010 0:53, fantasai a écrit :
> On 10/06/2010 04:15 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>> Řyvind and Geoffrey,
>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c414-flt-ln-002.htm
>> We discussed the c414-flt-ln-002 test before.
> I've altered the test to make it easier to determine the pass/fail
> conditions:
>    http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/css1/c414-flt-ln-002.xht
> Let me know if this addresses the problem.
> ~fantasai


I have not examined a lot your altered version (I have a very busy
schedule today). But, in the mailing list discussion we had,

- I am sure we agreed to remove the borders around the big boxes and the
small boxes
- I am sure we all agreed to reduce the number of boxes; I provided a
testcase with only 2 instead of 4 [1]; I even submitted it for feedback
in www-style mailing list [2]
- I was for and I am still for inviting the tester to resize viewport;
in my opinion, resizing window should be part of the testcase

Finally, note that a slightly different version of that testcase is in
the CSS 1 test suite:

[2]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0351.html

regards, Gérard
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:

CSS 2.1 test suite (RC3; October 27th 2010):

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 19:22:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:22 UTC