W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Proposed improvements to c414-flt-ln-002

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:52:04 -0500
Message-ID: <4CFDA154.902@inkedblade.net>
To: css21testsuite@gtalbot.org
CC: Řyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 12/06/2010 02:21 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
> Le Lun 6 décembre 2010 0:53, fantasai a écrit :
>> On 10/06/2010 04:15 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>>> Řyvind and Geoffrey,
>>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c414-flt-ln-002.htm
>>> We discussed the c414-flt-ln-002 test before.
>> I've altered the test to make it easier to determine the pass/fail
>> conditions:
>>     http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/css1/c414-flt-ln-002.xht
>> Let me know if this addresses the problem.
> Fantasai,
> I have not examined a lot your altered version (I have a very busy
> schedule today). But, in the mailing list discussion we had,
> - I am sure we agreed to remove the borders around the big boxes and the
> small boxes


> - I am sure we all agreed to reduce the number of boxes; I provided a
> testcase with only 2 instead of 4 [1]; I even submitted it for feedback
> in www-style mailing list [2]

I don't think it's really necessary, and given the original testcase it's
replacing (the CSS1 testcase) has four, I'd rather leave it at four unless
it's a problem.

> - I was for and I am still for inviting the tester to resize viewport;
> in my opinion, resizing window should be part of the testcase


> Finally, note that a slightly different version of that testcase is in
> the CSS 1 test suite:
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS1/20070302/sec414.htm

Exactly. The tests beginning with c### are Hixie's rewrite of the CSS1 test suite.

Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 02:52:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:22 UTC