- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:52:04 -0500
- To: css21testsuite@gtalbot.org
- CC: Řyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon@opera.com>, "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
On 12/06/2010 02:21 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: > > Le Lun 6 décembre 2010 0:53, fantasai a écrit : >> On 10/06/2010 04:15 PM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: >>> Řyvind and Geoffrey, >>> >>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/c414-flt-ln-002.htm >>> >>> We discussed the c414-flt-ln-002 test before. >> >> I've altered the test to make it easier to determine the pass/fail >> conditions: >> http://test.csswg.org/source/approved/css2.1/src/css1/c414-flt-ln-002.xht >> >> Let me know if this addresses the problem. > > Fantasai, > > I have not examined a lot your altered version (I have a very busy > schedule today). But, in the mailing list discussion we had, > > - I am sure we agreed to remove the borders around the big boxes and the > small boxes Done. > - I am sure we all agreed to reduce the number of boxes; I provided a > testcase with only 2 instead of 4 [1]; I even submitted it for feedback > in www-style mailing list [2] I don't think it's really necessary, and given the original testcase it's replacing (the CSS1 testcase) has four, I'd rather leave it at four unless it's a problem. > - I was for and I am still for inviting the tester to resize viewport; > in my opinion, resizing window should be part of the testcase Done. > Finally, note that a slightly different version of that testcase is in > the CSS 1 test suite: > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS1/20070302/sec414.htm Exactly. The tests beginning with c### are Hixie's rewrite of the CSS1 test suite. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 02:52:49 UTC