W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > March 2009

<link rel=reviewer>

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:27:53 +0100
To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uqzo0rs964w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>
During the CSS WG we discussed a convention where someone would review a  
test and if the test was found fine she/he would add <link rel=reviewer>  
meaning that the test was approved. If the test was not found fine changes  
would be made and the original author would verify the changes. However,  
what flag is used in that case?

Would it make sense for the person making changes to add a <link  
rel=contributor> and for the original author to add the reviewer keyword  
to his/her <link rel=author> element? Roughly you would either end up with:

   <link rel=author href=...>
   <link rel=reviewer href=...>

or

   <link rel="author reviewer" href=...>
   <link rel=contributor href=...>

And the combination of the entities identified by author, contributor, and  
reviewer would be responsible for the correctness of the test.


(Until this is agreed upon/clarified I will not review any tests.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 13:28:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:58 GMT