W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > July 2008

Re: CSS2.1 i18n and bidi tests for review

From: Eira Monstad <eiram@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:30:49 +0200
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uehd1nwenwv5is@voodoobaby.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:21:04 +0200, fantasai  
<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

> Eira Monstad wrote:
>>  Cheers,
>>  I've been working on some bidi related tests for the 2.1 testsuite, as  
>> well as converting a few of Richard Ishida's tests for language  
>> dependent styling to match the testsuite template. The tests are ready  
>> for review at http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/
>
> http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/bidi-direction-001.xht
> http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/bidi-direction-002.xht
>
> So.. there seem to be two main assertions here:
>    - That 'direction' inherits (and affects the paragraph text as  
> defined).
>    - That 'direction' affects alignment.
> Both tests test both, and I'm having a hard time figuring out what is
> functionally different between the two.

001 tests that body direction is inherited by element when direction is  
not specified on the paragraph.

002 tests that body direction is overridden correctly by direction  
property on the paragraph.

I have updated the assert in 002 to make the difference clearer.


-- 
Eira Monstad
CoreQA

Furthermore, it is my opinion that BTS2 must be destroyed
Received on Friday, 18 July 2008 09:32:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:56 GMT