W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > July 2008

Re: CSS2.1 i18n and bidi tests for review

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:38:43 -0700
Message-ID: <4881B623.7090700@inkedblade.net>
To: Eira Monstad <eiram@opera.com>
CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org

Eira Monstad wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:21:04 +0200, fantasai 
> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> 
>> Eira Monstad wrote:
>>>  Cheers,
>>>  I've been working on some bidi related tests for the 2.1 testsuite, 
>>> as well as converting a few of Richard Ishida's tests for language 
>>> dependent styling to match the testsuite template. The tests are 
>>> ready for review at http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/
>>
>> http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/bidi-direction-001.xht
>> http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/bidi-direction-002.xht
>>
>> So.. there seem to be two main assertions here:
>>    - That 'direction' inherits (and affects the paragraph text as 
>> defined).
>>    - That 'direction' affects alignment.
>> Both tests test both, and I'm having a hard time figuring out what is
>> functionally different between the two.
> 
> 001 tests that body direction is inherited by element when direction is 
> not specified on the paragraph.
> 
> 002 tests that body direction is overridden correctly by direction 
> property on the paragraph.
> 
> I have updated the assert in 002 to make the difference clearer.

They both test both. It's just that in 001 the "override" test is called
the control, and its default alignment is not tested.

~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 19 July 2008 09:39:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:56 GMT